Closed echeipesh closed 3 years ago
Merging #107 (62d2dab) into develop (75e5ac6) will decrease coverage by
0.03%
. The diff coverage is1.63%
.:exclamation: Current head 62d2dab differs from pull request most recent head 5f5d924. Consider uploading reports for the commit 5f5d924 to get more accurate results
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #107 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 3.57% 3.54% -0.04%
==========================================
Files 255 257 +2
Lines 5198 5218 +20
==========================================
- Hits 186 185 -1
- Misses 5012 5033 +21
Flag | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
unittests | 3.54% <1.63%> (-0.04%) |
:arrow_down: |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
...t_change_diagnostic/ForestChangeDiagnosticDF.scala | 0.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
...change_diagnostic/ForestChangeDiagnosticData.scala | 34.86% <0.00%> (-0.47%) |
:arrow_down: |
...ummarystats/forest_change_diagnostic/package.scala | 100.00% <ø> (+14.28%) |
:arrow_up: |
...ats/gfwpro_dashboard/GfwProDashboardAnalysis.scala | 0.00% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
...marystats/gfwpro_dashboard/GfwProDashboardDF.scala | 0.00% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
...rystats/gfwpro_dashboard/GfwProDashboardData.scala | 0.00% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
...fwpro_dashboard/GfwProDashboardDataDateCount.scala | 0.00% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
.../gfwpro_dashboard/GfwProDashboardGridSources.scala | 0.00% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
...arystats/gfwpro_dashboard/GfwProDashboardRDD.scala | 0.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
...tats/gfwpro_dashboard/GfwProDashboardRawData.scala | 0.00% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
... and 7 more |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 75e5ac6...5f5d924. Read the comment docs.
Requires: https://github.com/wri/gfw_forest_loss_geotrellis/pull/105
Pull request checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
Pull request type
Please check the type of change your PR introduces: - [ ] Bugfix - [x] Feature - [ ] Code style update (formatting, renaming) - [ ] Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes) - [ ] Build related changes - [ ] Documentation content changes - [ ] Other (please describe): ## What is the current behavior? Currently `tree_cover_extent_total` is absent from dashboard output. ## What is the new behavior? `tree_cover_extent_total` is present, it describes the area of pixels where GLAD alert has happened that has tree cover density > 30% It also introduces the error columns like FCD gained in https://github.com/wri/gfw_forest_loss_geotrellis/pull/105 that ensure that every record present in the input is present in the output. ## Does this introduce a breaking change? - [x] Yes - [ ] No downstream consumers will have to adjust their code to use the tree cover extent and errors