treecoverloss package was referring to the old plantations layer, not…

[dagibbs22]

… the plantedForests layer. Now it's using the correct layer.

Pull request checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

• [x] Make sure you are requesting to pull a topic/feature/bugfix branch (right side). Don't request your master!
• [x] Make sure you are making a pull request against the develop branch (left side). Also you should start your branch off our develop.
• [x] Check the commit's or even all commits' message styles matches our requested structure.
• [x] Check your code additions will fail neither code linting checks nor unit test.

Pull request type

Please check the type of change your PR introduces:

• [x] Bugfix
• [ ] Feature
• [ ] Code style update (formatting, renaming)
• [ ] Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
• [ ] Build related changes
• [ ] Documentation content changes
• [ ] Other (please describe):

What is the current behavior?

Using the wrong (old) plantation layer for treecoverloss analysis (used in ArcPy client).

What is the new behavior?

• Uses the plantedForest layer instead of the plantation layer.

Does this introduce a breaking change?

• [ ] Yes
• [x] No

Other information

Ran locally in sbt shell and got results split by plantation. Seems to work now.