wri / gfw_forest_loss_geotrellis

Global Tree Cover Loss Analysis using Geotrellis and SPARK
MIT License
10 stars 8 forks source link

bugfix/gfwpro_forest_change_regions #173

Closed manukala6 closed 1 year ago

manukala6 commented 1 year ago

Pull request checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

Pull request type

Please check the type of change your PR introduces: - [x] Bugfix - [ ] Feature - [ ] Code style update (formatting, renaming) - [ ] Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes) - [ ] Build related changes - [ ] Documentation content changes - [ ] Other (please describe): ## What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: GTC-2198

What is the new behavior?

Does this introduce a breaking change?

Other information

codecov-commenter commented 1 year ago

Codecov Report

Base: 16.04% // Head: 16.06% // Increases project coverage by +0.01% :tada:

Coverage data is based on head (5209b00) compared to base (d3babb2). Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

:mega: This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## develop #173 +/- ## =========================================== + Coverage 16.04% 16.06% +0.01% =========================================== Files 275 275 Lines 5951 5952 +1 =========================================== + Hits 955 956 +1 Misses 4996 4996 ``` | Flag | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | unittests | `16.06% <100.00%> (+0.01%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=wri#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. | [Impacted Files](https://codecov.io/gh/wri/gfw_forest_loss_geotrellis/pull/173?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=wri) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [.../org/globalforestwatch/layers/GFWProCoverage.scala](https://codecov.io/gh/wri/gfw_forest_loss_geotrellis/pull/173?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=wri#diff-c3JjL21haW4vc2NhbGEvb3JnL2dsb2JhbGZvcmVzdHdhdGNoL2xheWVycy9HRldQcm9Db3ZlcmFnZS5zY2FsYQ==) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | | Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=wri). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=wri)

:umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.