I returned to WM (3.2.0 on windows) after long time and I have to say it has hugely improved. Thanks!
I ingest my markdown files with pandoc to produce the final document. Pandoc uses and ignores html comments <!-- --> that, instead, are treated in no special way by WM. Moreover WM comments // Comment create problems — in fact they are unusable — because they are deal as normal text by pandoc.
Another problem is the absence of specific style for html comments.
Could the addition of html comments be a new feature for WM?
I returned to WM (3.2.0 on windows) after long time and I have to say it has hugely improved. Thanks!
I ingest my markdown files with pandoc to produce the final document. Pandoc uses and ignores html comments
<!-- -->
that, instead, are treated in no special way by WM. Moreover WM comments// Comment
create problems — in fact they are unusable — because they are deal as normal text by pandoc.Another problem is the absence of specific style for html comments.
Could the addition of html comments be a new feature for WM?
Thanks again! mario