Fix duplicated PublishActiveSessionCount configuration

[KD23243]

Proposed changes in this pull request

• $subject

Related Issue

• https://github.com/wso2/product-is/issues/21506

When should this PR be merged

[Please describe any preconditions that need to be addressed before we can merge this pull request.]

Follow up actions

[List any possible follow-up actions here; for instance, testing data migrations, software that we need to install on staging and production environments.]

-

Checklist (for reviewing)

General

• [ ] Is this PR explained thoroughly? All code changes must be accounted for in the PR description.
• [ ] Is the PR labeled correctly?

Functionality

• [ ] Are all requirements met? Compare implemented functionality with the requirements specification.
• [ ] Does the UI work as expected? There should be no Javascript errors in the console; all resources should load. There should be no unexpected errors. Deliberately try to break the feature to find out if there are corner cases that are not handled.

Code

• [ ] Do you fully understand the introduced changes to the code? If not ask for clarification, it might uncover ways to solve a problem in a more elegant and efficient way.
• [ ] Does the PR introduce any inefficient database requests? Use the debug server to check for duplicate requests.
• [ ] Are all necessary strings marked for translation? All strings that are exposed to users via the UI must be marked for translation.

Tests

• [ ] Are there sufficient test cases? Ensure that all components are tested individually; models, forms, and serializers should be tested in isolation even if a test for a view covers these components.
• [ ] If this is a bug fix, are tests for the issue in place? There must be a test case for the bug to ensure the issue won’t regress. Make sure that the tests break without the new code to fix the issue.
• [ ] If this is a new feature or a significant change to an existing feature? has the manual testing spreadsheet been updated with instructions for manual testing?

Security

• [ ] Confirm this PR doesn't commit any keys, passwords, tokens, usernames, or other secrets.
• [ ] Are all UI and API inputs run through forms or serializers?
• [ ] Are all external inputs validated and sanitized appropriately?
• [ ] Does all branching logic have a default case?
• [ ] Does this solution handle outliers and edge cases gracefully?
• [ ] Are all external communications secured and restricted to SSL?

Documentation

• [ ] Are changes to the UI documented in the platform docs? If this PR introduces new platform site functionality or changes existing ones, the changes should be documented.
• [ ] Are changes to the API documented in the API docs? If this PR introduces new API functionality or changes existing ones, the changes must be documented.
• [ ] Are reusable components documented? If this PR introduces components that are relevant to other developers (for instance a mixin for a view or a generic form) they should be documented in the Wiki.

[sonarcloud[bot]]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 40.69%. Comparing base (c51aea8) to head (31152b4). Report is 12 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #6102 +/- ## ============================================ + Coverage 40.68% 40.69% +0.01% - Complexity 14477 14478 +1 ============================================ Files 1764 1763 -1 Lines 117801 117816 +15 Branches 19092 19095 +3 ============================================ + Hits 47923 47942 +19 + Misses 62592 62588 -4 Partials 7286 7286 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/wso2/carbon-identity-framework/pull/6102/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=wso2) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unit](https://app.codecov.io/gh/wso2/carbon-identity-framework/pull/6102/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=wso2) | `25.01% <ø> (+0.01%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=wso2#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.