Open clarkkm2 opened 5 years ago
Can you provide an example please? Hopefully a short document I can compile myself. Sorry, can’t promise a quick fix.
I created a short document to demonstrate my problem, and the issue didn’t occur in the new document. There must be some issue with my original document. I will spend time debugging it. Thanks for responding!
On Jun 27, 2019, at 23:29, Will Robertson notifications@github.com wrote:
Can you provide an example please? Hopefully a short document I can compile myself. Sorry, can’t promise a quick fix.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
My issue seems to stem from adding an abstract in the article class. If I comment out the abstract, the numbering works again. I'll paste some code in another comment.
\documentclass[12pt,authoryear,letter]{article} \usepackage{amsmath,colonequals,color} \usepackage{breqn} \usepackage[utf8x]{inputenc} \usepackage{amsfonts,marvosym}
\begin{document}
\title{Sample Title}
\author{Author One$^$, Author Two$^$, \ Author Three$^{}$, and Author Four$^$ \[+2mm] $^${\small School One}\ $^{}${\small School Two}} \date{}
\maketitle
\abstract{Here is some text. }
\subsubsection{A subsection}
Here is an equation
\begin{equation}\label{eq:cont_gmm}
1+2+3+\ldots +n=\frac{n(n+1)}{2}
\end{equation}
Here is another equation
\begin{equation}\label{eq:zig}
\pi=C/d
\end{equation}
Here is an equation with dmath' \begin{dmath} 210=1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10+11+12+13+14+15+16+17+18+19+20 \end{dmath} Here is another with
dmath'
\begin{dmath}
\pi=C/d
\end{dmath}
The equation numbers for the dmath' equations don't line up with each other, or with the numbering for the
traditional' equations. Comment out the abstract and it works.
\end{document}
Equations with \begin{dmath} at different points on the same page have equation numbers that don't line up with each other and with equations in \begin{equation} mode. Any way to fix this myself?