219 added the ability to couple the temperature and density axes when computing the level populations. This should also be an option when computing the radiative loss. While the keyword will propagate appropriately, the shape of the total radiative loss will be wrong because it does not account for temperature and density being potentially dependent axes:
219 added the ability to couple the temperature and density axes when computing the level populations. This should also be an option when computing the radiative loss. While the keyword will propagate appropriately, the shape of the total radiative loss will be wrong because it does not account for temperature and density being potentially dependent axes:
https://github.com/wtbarnes/fiasco/blob/bb4670e2df538c674149285235d9555f736d0960/fiasco/collections.py#L272
There should be an additional if block that makes the density dimension length 1 if the
couple_density_temperaturekwarg is set.