Number of classes much greater than the number of unique predictions obtained

[deshanadesai]

Hi! Hope you are doing well, I enjoyed reading this paper and the code. I was trying to adapt this method to my own task on a custom dataset. Something strange i noticed for my task was:

Even with a high number of classes given as input to the model, eg. 1024, the predictions produced by the model had only 34 unique values:

torch.unique(data['predictions']) tensor([ 13, 29, 54, 60, 79, 93, 105, 150, 188, 253, 260, 286, 293, 333, 347, 363, 378, 406, 408, 414, 418, 447, 450, 492, 509, 529, 542, 580, 602, 615, 628, 635, 643, 662, 670, 677, 685, 698, 711, 720, 734, 741, 765, 799, 810, 847, 848, 859, 910, 919, 932, 933])

Do you think this is possible when faced with a large amount of overclustering?

Would highly appreciate your input.

Thank you, Deshana

[wvangansbeke]

Hi @deshanadesai,

Thank you for your interest.

Hard to say since I don't know which dataset you're using. In order to discover what the model has learned I would take a look at few clusters and a few neighbors. You can also compare it to KMeans clustering.

It might be that you don't have enough images in your dataset to find reliable clusters or that the settings for the pretext task are not ideal (i.e. duration of training, augmentation strategy, etc.) for your particular problem.

[anewusername77]

Hi! Hope you are doing well, I enjoyed reading this paper and the code. I was trying to adapt this method to my own task on a custom dataset. Something strange i noticed for my task was:

Even with a high number of classes given as input to the model, eg. 1024, the predictions produced by the model had only 34 unique values:

torch.unique(data['predictions']) tensor([ 13, 29, 54, 60, 79, 93, 105, 150, 188, 253, 260, 286, 293, 333, 347, 363, 378, 406, 408, 414, 418, 447, 450, 492, 509, 529, 542, 580, 602, 615, 628, 635, 643, 662, 670, 677, 685, 698, 711, 720, 734, 741, 765, 799, 810, 847, 848, 859, 910, 919, 932, 933])

Do you think this is possible when faced with a large amount of overclustering?

Would highly appreciate your input.

Thank you, Deshana

I'm having this probem too, and I've found out that neighbors after runing pretext task are incorrect. Just don't know how to adjust it.(I'm using moco.py, image size is larger than 224*224)

[arbab-ml]

I am also experiencing the same issue @wvangansbeke can you please skim through my pretext config file. Thank you,

---

Setup

setup: simclr

Model

backbone: resnet50
model_kwargs: head: mlp features_dim: 128

Dataset

train_db_name: batsnet val_db_name: batsnet num_classes: 5

Loss

criterion: simclr criterion_kwargs: temperature: 0.1

Hyperparameters

epochs: 30 optimizer: sgd optimizer_kwargs: nesterov: False weight_decay: 0.0001 momentum: 0.9 lr: 0.4 scheduler: cosine scheduler_kwargs: lr_decay_rate: 0.03 #0.1 batch_size: 50 num_workers: 8

Transformations

augmentation_strategy: batsnet_strategy augmentation_kwargs: crop_size: 128 color_jitter_random_apply: p: 0.8 color_jitter: brightness: 0.4 contrast: 0.4 saturation: 0.4 hue: 0.1 random_grayscale: p: 0.2 normalize: mean: [0.4914, 0.4822, 0.4465] std: [0.2023, 0.1994, 0.2010]

transformation_kwargs: crop_size: 128 normalize: mean: [0.4914, 0.4822, 0.4465] std: [0.2023, 0.1994, 0.2010]

[arbab-ml]

and good luck with NeurIPS. :-)

[wvangansbeke]

Hi @arbab97,

That looks okay. Since the amount classes is only 5 in your dataset I don't think this should really be a problem then. What are the entropy loss and consistency loss? Are the losses going down? What kind of data are you using? What do you get with KMeans?

[wvangansbeke]

If there are still issues, let me know. I'm closing this for now.