Closed loyd closed 3 months ago
Looks like a great idea! Right now, I’m way too busy to make big changes to the crate, but I’ll definitely do this in the long run.
FYI: published https://crates.io/crates/sdd / source: https://github.com/wvwwvwwv/scalable-delayed-dealloc
=> This will be integrated into it next month.
Thanks a lot!
I appreciate your implementation of EBR and plan to incorporate it into future projects, specifically for implementing a slab structure. However, I have concerns regarding the
scc
dependency potentially becoming heavy. Consequently, I would prefer to rely on a more lightweight crate.Additionally, segregating EBR into its own dedicated crate would help
scc
's evolution, including potential breaking changes (e.g. https://github.com/wvwwvwwv/scalable-concurrent-containers/issues/105). This separation allows for the coexistence of multiplescc
versions (such as v2, v3, etc.) within the same project, each using the same collectors. A similar modular approach is already used across the ecosystem (e.g.,signal_hook
andsignal_hook_registry
crates).So, what do you think about publishing
scc-ebr
and movingscc
to use it?