Closed wwiecek closed 3 years ago
@rmeager when you work on baggr next do you mind having a look?
This always had DTs, just like the old Rubin model example in stan always had DTs -- mea culpa on this. Inspecting the model code, it looks like we didnt re-center this model when we re-centered the Rubin model last year (or 2019), so it could just be that?
Good call, I'll check if there is a simple fix and report back here
the way i was checking this was actually a bit wrong, not the model itself; my current centered parameterisation idea is giving stupid results so it needs more work; I'm leaving this open because that model needs re-writing for various other reasons, but for the record, the current version should work fine too
This has now been fixed with rewritten mu&tau model.
I get 100 DTs here, even though the model is very basic -- why?