be consistent with text in _item_description (i.e. include "in
angstroms" also for _reflns items)
the resolution limits are actually those of data processing and not
for data collection (which are nostly just geometrical and
determined by experimental setup)
it might be better to use "lower" instead of "less" in
_pdbx_item_description.description: this is consistent with the
notion of a "low resolution limit" and avoids the idea that a
numerical value should be less than another one (since a lower
resolution value actually means a higher numerical value).
_item_description.description _pdbx_item_description.description
for
_reflns.d_resolution_high _reflns.d_resolution_low _reflns_shell.d_res_high _reflns_shell.d_res_low
Reasoning:
be consistent with text in _item_description (i.e. include "in angstroms" also for _reflns items)
the resolution limits are actually those of data processing and not for data collection (which are nostly just geometrical and determined by experimental setup)
it might be better to use "lower" instead of "less" in _pdbx_item_description.description: this is consistent with the notion of a "low resolution limit" and avoids the idea that a numerical value should be less than another one (since a lower resolution value actually means a higher numerical value).