Docc

[Tyler-Keith-Thompson]

Linked Issue:

Checklist:

• [x] Did you sign the Contributor License Agreement?
• [x] Is the linter reporting 0 errors?
• [x] Did you comply with our styleguide?
• [x] Does the CI pipeline pass?
• [x] Did you update the documentation?

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #148 (32e2544) into main (7ac2343) will not change coverage. The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #148   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.27%   91.27%           
=======================================
  Files          92       94    +2     
  Lines        2373     2373           
=======================================
  Hits         2166     2166           
  Misses        207      207           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
Sources/SwiftCurrent/Models/Workflow.swift	100.00% <ø> (ø)
Sources/SwiftCurrent/TypeErased/AnyWorkflow.swift	81.13% <ø> (-1.33%)	:arrow_down:
Sources/SwiftCurrent/Models/PassedArgs.swift	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...urces/SwiftCurrent/Models/ThenProceedMethods.swift	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data Powered by Codecov. Last update 2c21eb8...32e2544. Read the comment docs.

[morganzellers]

Commit aec111dd58e520ed519faded70272938ccc3c822 seemed to bork the pod spec lint... not sure why

[Tyler-Keith-Thompson]

This was an interesting idea. It was an attempt to use DocC as a way of onboarding contributors to the library. I'm not sure that's a great use-case though. This can remain in our history if we ever want it back, but the PR isn't the biggest priority.

[Tyler-Keith-Thompson]

This was an interesting idea. It was an attempt to use DocC as a way of onboarding contributors to the library. I'm not sure that's a great use-case though. This can remain in our history if we ever want it back, but the PR isn't the biggest priority.