[PR]: Regridding nan update (dask part only)

[lee1043]

Description

To fast track issue resolve for #615, a part of PR #613 is applied in this PR which is applying .values instead of .data for dask case following changes made by @tomvothecoder and @jasonb5

• Closes #615

Checklist

• [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
• [x] My changes generate no new warnings
• [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

If applicable:

• [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• [ ] New and existing unit tests pass with my changes (locally and CI/CD build)
• [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• [ ] I have noted that this is a breaking change for a major release (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (5de4d7f) to head (8c18727).

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #634 +/- ## ========================================= Coverage 100.00% 100.00% ========================================= Files 15 15 Lines 1588 1588 ========================================= Hits 1588 1588 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[lee1043]

@tomvothecoder @jasonb5 sorry for the duplicating, but as some of my PMP workflow is highly influenced by the issue #615, I wanted repair for that part to be fast tracked, because I guess the new issue found in PR #613 could delay the merging of the PR than anticipated.

[tomvothecoder]

Thanks @lee1043. I am giving us another week so that @jasonb5 can try to get PR #613 done. If it's not done by then, we can merge this PR and move forward with releasing v0.7.0.

[tomvothecoder]

I'll go ahead and merge this.

[lee1043]

@tomvothecoder @jasonb5 thanks!