Open juanbretti opened 22 hours ago
Another option is to have WEBP embedded into formats which do not offer transparency. This technically would lower the file size too. However, it might break previews and thumbnails on some setups. Thus, PNG was the safest.
Or embed PNG into PNG, WEBP into WEBP etc. and then JPG/JPEG would have white or black background. But this makes it much harder to deal with different color schemes e.g.: when flattening. Thus again, in this case PNG is simply more universal too.
If you would like to play around with it:
@xRyul , you have very good points. I agree with you that PNG is the safest way to keep transparency.
For that scenario, maybe I would recommend renaming the file extension to .png
, so it is clear for the user.
Another solution could be to add a feature to remove transparency (set a solid background). You might need to consider settings for:
.jpg
, .webp
, .png
, same as original, same as "Convert > Convert to",...)By the way, this annotations is a very cool feature for this plugin.
Hello, Quick question.
When annotating an image, is the file always saved as PNG? Even when the original was JPEG, and the actual filename has extension .jpg I do understand you are trying to preserve transparency. That's why you are using PNG?
Thank you! Great idea to have a quick annotation tool!