ArmorStand water move enhancement

[kaxlabs]

If you're using papermc, you can accomplish preventing armorstands from moving in water quite easily without disabling gravity:

    @EventHandler
    public void onEntityMove(EntityMoveEvent event) {
        if (event.getEntity() instanceof ArmorStand armorstand) {
            if (armorstand.isInWater()) {
                event.setCancelled(true);
            }
        }
    }

I don't have enough time to make a pull request, but since you're using spigot-api, I'd recommend using reflection to check if the papermc event exists.

[xSavior-of-God]

Hi @kaxon-dev, thanks for the advice. As soon as I have a moment I add it to the checks.

[xSavior-of-God]

I found the method you mentioned above (armorstand.isInWater()) in the spigot API. I'm not sure if it is present in all versions, as soon as I have a moment I take a look. https://hub.spigotmc.org/javadocs/bukkit/org/bukkit/entity/Entity.html#isInWater()

for now the idea is to diversify these two checks for what they are, so 1 => to disable the gravity 2 => to disable movement in the water

but i'm sure that i don't need to add paper-api for now.

[xSavior-of-God]

Hi @kaxon-dev, I analyzed the thing a bit, and in my opinion it could be heavy as a process for a spigot server. For a papermc I don't know how such an event can be optimized, it always check the location of each entity every time, (Imagine the weight of this process if you have millions of entities in the world).

So, after a few attempts I believe that it is not the best way to block this type of event, reasons:

• It is compatible only for paper and for versions 1.17+ compiled in java 16-17.
• Also, by doing this, I block the use of the resource to who uses previous versions (like 1.12-1.13).
• In addition this event could also be heavy if you have a server with many entities.

Yes, you could do the listener by hand, i.e. check all the armorstand 1 to 1 for each x tick, but in my opinion it is bullshit:

• You should make 1 thread to get every entity in the world (obviously in loaded chunks) and check if it is anarmorstand... to then manage and archive its location.

• And then every tick (minimum 1, otherwise then you have the animation effect that goes back), you should check if the location is different and if it is in the water you should take the armorstand and move it back every time the location changes.

I don't know, but in my opinion it seems like bullshit, when you could just block gravity since the generation of the entity.

Ah yes, I assume that paper does this thing like that, for each entity, I don't know how it doesn't make it overlap, but in my opinion some slight delay is present with the increase of entities and players.

So in summary, I'm sorry but it's not possible at the moment. If you have any better ideas to handle it, say it... for now, I don't see a better way than to turn off the gravity.

[kaxlabs]

Thanks for the information. Since that solution isn't feasible, how about instead of disabling armor stand gravity altogether, you add a configuration setting for scanning the chunks every X amount of minutes and set their gravity depending on whether or not they're in water?

if (entity.getType() == EntityType.ARMOR_STAND) {
    entity.setGravity(!entity.isInWater());
}

[xSavior-of-God]

Hi, Yes it is a good idea, but I do not do the method for everyone, I mean, I would do something that does not involve the change of the gravity of all the armorstands, in order to avoid delays, I'd rather do something like:

If condition: armorstand is in water and gravity is enabled do: disable gravity else: continue;

The only thing now is to figure out if I can add this check to the thread that checks the number of armorstand x chunk/xyz... or do a new thread...

Anyway, I'll try to optimize the controls, also if i can, i try to manage everything from 1 single common thread.