Closed gaborigloi closed 6 years ago
I've listed the SM
object of GFS2 and it contained the SR_PROBE capability & feature indeed, and the probe quicktest also found the GFS2 SR and ran.
This is probably fine, but it's best to discuss it before merging. Since we're planning to make SR.probe_ext
work on every SR that has the SR_PROBE
capability, we probably shouldn't introduce a new capability for probe_ext
.
RIght so probe_ext would be handled purely on the XAPI side, and we know that if a SMAPIv3 plugin reports probe capability we would get the enhanced probe_ext and regular probe at same time. And for SMAPIv1 XAPI could translate probe into probe_ext if possible.
This is okay to do now, because SR.probe works for SMAPIv3 SRs too: we try to reconstruct the same XML structure that is returned by SMAPIv1 SRs.
Signed-off-by: Gabor Igloi gabor.igloi@citrix.com