Closed jcabot closed 4 years ago
All the classes in the CSS definition have the prefix rcw-
(e.g., rcw-header
, rcw-message
). I don't think there will be a conflict.
We can change this prefix to xatkit
to make it more intuitive.
Yes. The point is that external users will look for the xatkit keyword
On Fri, Apr 3, 2020, 11:39 Hamza Ed-douibi notifications@github.com wrote:
All the classes in the CSS definition have the prefix rcw- (e.g., rcw-header, rcw-message). I don't think there will be a conflict.
We can change this prefix to xatkit to make it more intuitive.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/xatkit-bot-platform/xatkit-chat-widget/issues/32#issuecomment-608338175, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAICQ3PJCRO55OFUC2E3XE3RKWVERANCNFSM4L22RFDA .
Not only to avoid conflicts (current names are probably original enough) but also to facilitate the future adaptation of the CSS, especially by external users
(e.g. a user that wants to adapt the widget to match their WP site will probably expect to find xatkit-XXX definitions in the CSS file as a way to know where he should start playing)