Closed ltldlzltl closed 2 years ago
Hi Tianling, I'd like to double check the recon first. Could you run the simulation with a phantom that has some structures, so that we can make sure the recon works correctly?
Hi Tianling, I'd like to double check the recon first. Could you run the simulation with a phantom that has some structures, so that we can make sure the recon works correctly? Hi, here is a recon example on male lung phantom. I turned off noise simulation in this example.
Hi Tianling, Do you still have the issue that it doesn't show BH artifacts? If yes, maybe try: 1) update the code to the latest version; 2) use the sample main/examples/Sim_Sample_Analyic.py, AND remove the bowtie (set cfg.protocol.bowtie = ""), AND set ct.physics.callback_post_log = "" (Disable BHC).
One more suggestion is that you may try the analytical water phantom, we have demonstrated BH artifacts in a study (will be published soon), in the latest code, please refer xcist\main\examples\Sim_Sample_Analyic.py
If you have more questions, please let us know.
Hi guys,
In my recent simulations, I found that beam hardening is not significant in the reconstruction results. To verify this, I built a water cylinder phantom and simulated the projection data with XCIST under a 120 kV spectrum. The reconstruction is done with ASTRA toolbox. Here is what I got. I also plotted the center row. Results show that there is no beam bardening artifact at all. My scan protocal
Physics configurations
Scanner protocol
Any idea why there is no beam hardening artifact?