I noticed that the "DB.Id" eRah provides for the identified compounds is not the "DB#" field from the imported MSP, but that it rather makes its own IDs. This caused me quite a bit of confusion in the beginning and makes it annoying when trying to find the compound in the library that eRah is referring to (especially when the name is non-unique). Is there are reason for this decision? To me it would seem more intuitive and robust to just use the ID that is already there for that purpose?
I noticed that the "DB.Id" eRah provides for the identified compounds is not the "DB#" field from the imported MSP, but that it rather makes its own IDs. This caused me quite a bit of confusion in the beginning and makes it annoying when trying to find the compound in the library that eRah is referring to (especially when the name is non-unique). Is there are reason for this decision? To me it would seem more intuitive and robust to just use the ID that is already there for that purpose?