Closed joprice closed 8 years ago
Looks like robotest is not published for 2.10. Actually at some point we should consider dropping 2.10 support, since it will reach end of life soon... This would simplify quite a few things with macros as well.
Awesome work. This paves the way to better code quality and proper tests :)
Ok I have the other fixes ready, but it's still going to fail on 2.10. Can this be the version we drop 2.10 support?
I’m not using it, so to me it doesn’t really matter :) But I think the best approach is to ask @47deg and on the mailing list / gitter.
Another simple approach is to ask the robotest people if they could issue a 2.10 release.
I was hoping you wouldn't say that.
I just checked their code out. It has crossScalaVersions
configured. Just ran the +test
, and both passed against 2.10 and 2.11, so looks like it won't be an issue to publish it. I'll create an issue.
FWIW there is a new version of macro-compat :) https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/scala-user/Ypnq_iVBICg
Updated to new macro-compat version and rebuild for 2.10 passed once robotest was published.
Merged, thanks!
Added scalac flags that revealed many warnings. Migrated macros to macro-compat to deal with many of them. Configured tests using roboelectric and added simple test for Bundles.