Closed bernhardkaindl closed 5 months ago
Merging #98 (a76f121) into master (d0e569d) will increase coverage by
2%
. Report is 16 commits behind head on master. The diff coverage is100%
.
Totals | |
---|---|
Change from base Build 8419300538: | -4.6% |
Covered Lines: | 2042 |
Relevant Lines: | 2260 |
Optionally allow repos to use Sonar to manage clean code and fix Sonar warnings
It can (optionally) add a pull request comment that looks like this:
Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed
Issues
Measures
0 Security Hotspots
100.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code
Example PR comment by Sonarcloud: https://github.com/xenserver-next/status-report/pull/26#issuecomment-2016318433
xen-bugtool's code is very clean at the moment, and this PR should help to test sonarcloud.
Code coverage (also checked by sonarcloud for this PR) confirms that the changed lines in xen-bugtool and the unit tests are already covered by existing unit tests that cover 90% of the code.
I checked if the change to
disk_list()
is indeed tested: Yes it is:Here is the documentation for the used GitHub action: https://github.com/SonarSource/sonarcloud-github-action?tab=readme-ov-file