Feat/monorepo reconfiguration

[DhivinX]

From now, building packages should work without any problems, just use pnpm dist. (Before doing so, remove all node_modules generated by yarn/npm) See README.md in section Project development.

Changes introduced by this PR:

• Improved dependencies between packages
• Configured the repository to use pnpm
• The README file has been updated with a table of contents and development instructions
• Turbo and build caching configured
• Fixed types in LayerRenderer.ts (webglrenderer), however this needs checking, I used type casting to force the correct argument types
• Completed .gitignore and added .npmignore so that when publishing a package, the "dist" folder is not excluded
• Added .editorconfig configuration, for now indentation is set to 4 spaces (We could use 2 spaces to get closer to the standards)

Planning:

• Add eslint and prettier configuration for linting and formatting code
• Unify tsconfig.json configuration for all packages
• Remove unnecessary references because packages have the necessary types connection in package.json

We could add Github Actions configuration to automate the publishing of packages when changes are pushed to the main branch. You would need to add a develop branch for the current code and a main branch would be the alive branch. Then when we merge the develop branch into main it would automatically publish the packages to the registry.

We could also add a dependabot configuration to keep external dependencies up to date.

[xeolabs]

Looks good to me, thanks very much @DhivinX

[paireks]

Wow, I can finally succesfully build it! :)

The only thing I had to do additionally is that between "npm i pnpm -g" and "pnpm install turbo --global" I had to restart the computer, because of that thing that happens on Windows and Macs: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/77224607/how-can-i-help-pnpm-find-its-global-directory

The last thing I personally miss right now probably is running the unit tests existing. @DhivinX have you tried running all of them, or some of them? If so: can the process be written down somewhere, so I can give it a try?

[DhivinX]

@paireks I will try to fix the tests in the next iteration.