Closed jbusecke closed 4 months ago
Lets see if 3.12 works as well?
3.12 does not seem to work (just stupidly created a dupe #74 and fails with
Obtaining file:///home/runner/work/aerobulk-python/aerobulk-python
Preparing metadata (setup.py): started
Preparing metadata (setup.py): finished with status 'error'
error: subprocess-exited-with-error
× python setup.py egg_info did not run successfully.
│ exit code: 1
╰─> [7 lines of output]
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<string>", line 2, in <module>
File "<pip-setuptools-caller>", line 34, in <module>
File "/home/runner/work/aerobulk-python/aerobulk-python/setup.py", line 7, in <module>
import numpy.distutils.command.sdist # noqa
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'numpy.distutils'
[end of output]
note: This error originates from a subprocess, and is likely not a problem with pip.
error: metadata-generation-failed
On first glance this seems like something in numpy has changed in recent versions? This def needs some deeper investigation.
I added "<3.12" to python_requires
to pin python during install for now. We will have to address 3.12 separately in #75
Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #68 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 90.03% 90.03% ======================================= Files 7 7 Lines 251 251 ======================================= Hits 226 226 Misses 25 25 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/xgcm/aerobulk-python/pull/68/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=xgcm) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/xgcm/aerobulk-python/pull/68/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=xgcm) | `90.03% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=xgcm#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.