Closed xebadir closed 4 years ago
Merging #33 into master will increase coverage by
0.94%
. The diff coverage is33.33%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #33 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 66.07% 67.01% +0.94%
==========================================
Files 7 9 +2
Lines 280 288 +8
Branches 76 76
==========================================
+ Hits 185 193 +8
Misses 73 73
Partials 22 22
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/xcape/__init__.py | 100.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
src/xcape/_version.py | 100.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
src/xcape/cape_numba.py | 50.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
src/xcape/core.py | 84.41% <ø> (ø) |
|
src/xcape/duck_array_ops.py | 79.31% <ø> (ø) |
|
src/xcape/srh.py | 93.33% <ø> (ø) |
|
src/xcape/stdheight.py | 62.50% <ø> (ø) |
|
src/xcape/xarray.py | 0.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
src/xcape/cape_fortran.py | 63.63% <33.33%> (ø) |
|
... and 2 more |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ec5b6a7...4556110. Read the comment docs.
Remaining tasks for documentation to be handled through this request: Determine whether to add documentation to both the ML and PL variants of the fortran codes. Clean up documentation for the SRH, CAPE and STDheight fortran components and their wrapper pyf files. Add documentation to cape_fortran.py, stdheight.py, duck_array_ops.py
Remaining tasks for documentation to be handled through this request:
Determine whether to add documentation to both the ML and PL variants of the fortran codes.
I think we should have documentation on both ML and PL, and simply copy and paste the common part and change ML or PL wording where appropriate.
Clean up documentation for the SRH, CAPE and STDheight fortran components and their wrapper pyf files. Add documentation to cape_fortran.py, stdheight.py, duck_array_ops.py
Both these need to be done indeed. I would do it in another PR tho.
First commit - add Bunkers method for storm motion applied in both the PYF wrapper and .f90 file for model levels only. Do we need to duplicate this into the pressure version, or is this redundant?