Closed nwlandry closed 1 month ago
Attention: Patch coverage is 99.18033%
with 1 line
in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 93.15%. Comparing base (
7646f9d
) to head (502f5c0
). Report is 1 commits behind head on main.
Files | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
xgi/readwrite/hif.py | 98.90% | 1 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
What's the difference between the HIF and our own format?
What's the difference between the HIF and our own format?
Lots of things. The HIF standard is being developed with 3 other higher-order libraries (and hopefully more in the near future) which means that this will be much more standard. Secondly, HIF has far more features than the format used in XGI-DATA (empy edges, edge-dependent node attributes, directed hypergraphs, etc.) so my hope is that we can finalize the format and then convert the files in XGI-DATA to this sometime down the road.
Great, sounds good, thanks a lot.
This PR adds:
__add__
method forIDDict