In the paper (and in the first table in the Readme.md) you report:
SS-DCNet (cls) | 56.1 (SHA) | 6.6 (SHB)
When running the evaluation code on SHA and SHB I find the following MAE results:
SS-DCNet | 55.571 (SHA) | 6.645 (SHB)
These are the same results as you report a bit later in the Readme.md.
My question is hence the following: Is the model provided here more performant on the Shanghai dataset part A than the reported SotA model in your paper?
In the paper (and in the first table in the Readme.md) you report: SS-DCNet (cls) | 56.1 (SHA) | 6.6 (SHB)
When running the evaluation code on SHA and SHB I find the following MAE results: SS-DCNet | 55.571 (SHA) | 6.645 (SHB)
These are the same results as you report a bit later in the Readme.md.
My question is hence the following: Is the model provided here more performant on the Shanghai dataset part A than the reported SotA model in your paper?