search

xhsyy / omnidroid

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/omnidroid
Apache License 2.0
1 stars 0 forks source link

Need Ant build file #3

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
It would be nice if we included an Ant build file in the project root with
some useful targets.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by mschidlo...@gmail.com on 3 Jun 2009 at 9:40

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by mschidlo...@gmail.com on 3 Jun 2009 at 9:44

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Valid point.  The SDK had a tool in 1.1 to build the ant file
(android-sdk-1.1-path/tools/activitycreator).  It's no longer present in the 
1.5 SDK
though, and I haven't looked to see how the ant build is generated in 1.5 
(maybe with
apkbuilder?).  Anyway, the autobuild script
(https://omnidroid.googlecode.com/svn/tools/autobuild/ant-build.sh) creates an 
ant
build file with:

build() {
    # Build it
    echo "  + Using android tools to build an ant file" && \
    cd $TEST_DIR && \
    env && \
    $ANDROID_BIN_DIR/activitycreator --out $TEST_DIR $MANIFEST && \
    echo "  + Building from ant build file" && \
    ant
    return $?
}

where ANDROID_BIN_DIR is just the path to your SDK/tools directory.

Original comment by case.and...@gmail.com on 3 Jun 2009 at 11:32

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
In 1.5 it's done with "android create project" (that's the command plus its 
first two
arguments). Would an automatically generate build file be sufficient?

Original comment by ksjohnson3 on 14 Jul 2009 at 3:20

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by ksjohnson3 on 24 Jul 2009 at 3:37

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
I found this helpful site: http://code.google.com/p/autoandroid/wiki/AndroidAnt

I've converted the build scripts to use 1.5 (android instead of 
activitycreator) and
create the ant build script (build.xml) with the magical command: android update
project -p $OMNIDROIDPATH -t 2

If you're still working on this let me know.

Original comment by case.and...@gmail.com on 12 Aug 2009 at 12:35

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
ksjohnson3, can you see if this would suffice:
http://codereview.appspot.com/104099

I don't think these build files will change all that much over time, so I don't 
think
it will be a problem if they were in the repo.

Original comment by case.and...@gmail.com on 12 Aug 2009 at 8:26

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was closed by revision r649.

Original comment by case.and...@gmail.com on 13 Aug 2009 at 3:50