If you include a list of alternatives, it may be better to also explain why one may want to use them.
Stog says that it's a "static website generator like Jekyll", but that's extremely misleading: its most interesting features are use of a custom XML markup to keep metadata together with page content in a single machine-trasnformable file and support for dynlink'ing native OCaml plugins, for example.
If you include a list of alternatives, it may be better to also explain why one may want to use them.
Stog says that it's a "static website generator like Jekyll", but that's extremely misleading: its most interesting features are use of a custom XML markup to keep metadata together with page content in a single machine-trasnformable file and support for dynlink'ing native OCaml plugins, for example.