SC-Duan
commented
6 years ago How did you deal with this problem? I got the same issue.
Open nottwy opened 6 years ago
SC-Duan
commented
6 years ago How did you deal with this problem? I got the same issue.
ZhuangYb
commented
6 years ago me too..
The following is the final part of the output log of mecat2cns.
========================================================
hsy.subreads.overlap.can.part87 contains reads 8700000 --- 8799996 hsy.subreads.overlap.can.part88 contains reads 8800000 --- 8899998 hsy.subreads.overlap.can.part89 contains reads 8900001 --- 8999998 hsy.subreads.overlap.can.part90 contains reads 9000002 --- 9043615 [partition_candidates] takes 7542.52 secs. [load_fasta_db] begins. [load_fasta_db] takes 435.02 secs. [processing hsy.subreads.overlap.can.part0] begins. mecat_pipe.sh: line 14: 103199 Killed mecat2cns -i 0 -t 24 -x $tech $output $subreads $corrected_reads
========================================================
Do you have any suggestion about this problem?
The corresponding code is pasted below:
File: reads_correction_can.cpp
========================================================
99 char process_info[1024]; 100 for (std::vector::iterator iter = partition_file_vec.begin(); iter != partition_file_vec.end(); ++iter)
101 {
102 sprintf(process_info, "processing %s", iter->file_name.c_str());
103 DynamicTimer dtimer(process_info);
104 consensus_one_partition_can(iter->file_name.c_str(), iter->min_seq_id, iter->max_seq_id, rco, reads, out);
105 }
106
=========================================================