Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
These really are separate projects. Omaha is in C++ and very Windows-specific
since it runs off the registry; update-engine is almost entirely in Objective-C
and needs special parameters for GUIDs (UUIDs) for machine, user and product
since Omaha is using the Windows registry for these things (or, for user GUID,
generating them itself).
However, this brings up a salient point. The update-engine codebase is
woefully out of date with respect to the actual implementation used in the
GoogleSoftwareUpdate.app. I am implementing an Omaha-style system with support
for reporting events to the server, anonymized machine ID and user ID, and
uninstall. (I should note this runs on demand and not as an agent, and uses
the Authentication Framework so the user authenticates like a normal Mac
Installer and knows when things are changing at the system level.)
I would prefer to port some of this back but in order to get around system
design problems I think I am diverging from the original direction of the
project. The clearest example is the global persistent KSFrameworkStats to
get around those nifty-looking but restrictive process-pipes (a single callback
would be much simpler and make the fact that you are actually passing several
objects along the pipe much clearer). The KSStatsCollection itself is a flat
dictionary, forcing you to maintain product-specific stats by munging the
productID into the key (productID///stat_name) and as a persistent store you
can't use the stats to report to different urls without breaking it up into
sub-dicts (by serverURL, based on product). So I am trashing the design
direction a bit such that merging back into the main branch would be onerous.
Would it be possible to update the code with what you (Google) are actually
using now for Omaha-style messages? Then it would be a lot easier for me to
figure out how you wanted to finish the project in that regard and I could
contribute any other fixes I have.
Cheers,
Pete
Original comment by peter.ta...@gmail.com
on 22 Jun 2010 at 4:22
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
sorin.sb...@gmail.com
on 2 May 2009 at 12:20