Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Need some more information, and possibly a sample.
If the sample is over 10MB, please email me a link.
Does this same problem occur with stock VSFilter 2.39 both with pre-buffering
enabled/disabled?
http://sourceforge.net/projects/guliverkli2/files/DirectShow%20Filters/DirectVob
Sub%202.39/VSFilter_20090624.zip/download
Does this occur with older versions of xy-VSFilter?
To be clear, your issue is a slow-down when multiple VOBSUB (DVD Bitmap
subtitle) lines are displayed at different locations on the screen?
Original comment by cyber.sp...@gmail.com
on 3 Dec 2011 at 1:41
just compared. No Lag/slowdown at all with stock VSFilter 2.39 :)
just play the OP part in sample
http://www.mediafire.com/?jk6lb83wp0b0066
change your DNS to google DNS access any blocked site
http://www.softpedia.com/get/Internet/Other-Internet-Related/Google-DNS-Helper.s
html
Google DNS helped me access lots of Blocked File host sites
>To be clear, your issue is a slow-down when multiple VOBSUB (DVD Bitmap
subtitle) >lines are displayed at different locations on the screen?
probably. is it due to xy-vsfilter renders bitmaps in series?
Original comment by ved_k...@ymail.com
on 3 Dec 2011 at 7:02
So there is no lag in VSFilter 2.39 with pre-buffer subpictures disabled?
I can't reproduce the problem on my system. CPU load is near-identical between
VSFilter 2.39 and xy-VSFilter without any lag while playing that sample.
I'll need to check with YuZhuoHuang, since I wasn't aware that any changes had
been made to the VOBSUB code compared to stock VSFilter. It could just be a
matter of different compiler optimizations, I really don't know.
A new build will be posted within the next 24 hours to the download section. No
changes related to this issue were made, but please confirm if the issue still
exists in the new build.
Original comment by cyber.sp...@gmail.com
on 3 Dec 2011 at 12:37
Checked VSFilter 2.39 Stock again
Pre-Buffer Subpic Disabled = Lag :(
Pre-Buffer Subpic Enabled = No Lag :)
Original comment by ved_k...@ymail.com
on 3 Dec 2011 at 12:58
OK, that makes sense now.
We'll look into re-enabling pre-buffering for VOBSUB-only, but it still may be
a couple months until we get around to it.
Original comment by cyber.sp...@gmail.com
on 3 Dec 2011 at 1:51
enabling pre-buffering for ASS would be better too
as it also lags almost same way only at Anime OP/ED part although less
compared to Vobsub
Original comment by ved_k...@ymail.com
on 3 Dec 2011 at 2:01
Re-enabling the existing VSFilter 2.39 pre-buffering code for VOBSUB-only
should be a relatively easy and straightforward process. That is the only
reason it was accepted so readily.
Original comment by cyber.sp...@gmail.com
on 3 Dec 2011 at 4:01
will it cause some serious problem if pre-buffering enabled for ASS subs
Original comment by ved_k...@ymail.com
on 3 Dec 2011 at 4:14
[deleted comment]
Simply, yes it would. There is no existing pre-buffering implementation which
could be enabled as-is for ASS subtitles without completely breaking
xy-VSFilter. Entirely new code would need to be written scratch and bugfixed
over a prolonged period of time. It's up in the air whether or not this will
ever happen, as it is a massive undertaking.
Original comment by cyber.sp...@gmail.com
on 3 Dec 2011 at 4:46
>Entirely new code would need to be written scratch and bugfixed over a
prolonged >period of time.
even copying stock VSFilter 2.39's subpic pre-buffer to xy-vsfilter won't work?
have you tried?
if yes. guess i would need to upgrade PC sometime soon.
Original comment by ved_k...@ymail.com
on 3 Dec 2011 at 6:23
VSFilter 2.39 pre-buffer doesn't support animation, but even if it did, the
bigger problem is that xy-VSFilter renders frames in a fundamentally different
way, plus it's added multiple caches which never existed before. All these
things which make xy-VSFilter so fast, are also things which break any existing
pre-buffering in VSFilter. That's not to say we'll never look into doing it,
just that it won't be anytime in the near-future.
Original comment by cyber.sp...@gmail.com
on 3 Dec 2011 at 7:06
is xy-vsfilter Vobsub Pre-buffering really working?
i m still experiencing same Lags :( (slow-down when multiple VOBSUB lines are
displayed at different location)
which still doesn't occur at all with stock vsfilter 2.39 (just checked twice)
Original comment by ved_k...@ymail.com
on 5 Dec 2011 at 11:52
> We'll look into re-enabling pre-buffering for VOBSUB-only,
> but it still may be a couple months until we get around to it.
Be patient, it's only been a ~2 days. Work on re-enabling vobsub pre-buffering
likely won't begin for ~2 _months_ as stated above.
Original comment by cyber.sp...@gmail.com
on 5 Dec 2011 at 1:48
sure :) i will wait.
it doesn't matter how long it will take
after all programing a code is not easy thing to do ;)
Pre-Buffer is actually really great Feature especially for old PC's.
i will be looking forward to when xy-vsfilter
able to use Pre-Buffering on most popular sub formats
no matter how long it will take :)
Original comment by ved_k...@ymail.com
on 5 Dec 2011 at 2:59
Issue 104 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by cyber.sp...@gmail.com
on 14 Jul 2012 at 11:08
When using XySubFilter 3.1.0.546 Beta, madVR will pre-buffer VOBSUB and other
image based subtitles like PGS & DVB.
xy-VSFilter (VSFilter.dll) still does not yet contain pre-buffering support for
image based subtitles.
Original comment by cyber.sp...@gmail.com
on 22 Jul 2013 at 2:33
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
ved_k...@ymail.com
on 2 Dec 2011 at 1:23