xieyaxiongfly
commented
6 years ago No, this is totally reasonable.
Please take a look at this slides. http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~yaxiongx/doc/CSI_compare.pptx
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 7:29 AM hanstseng123 notifications@github.com wrote:
I use TP-LINK wdr4300 as AP and client which are equipped 3 antennas(although they can only use 2 antennas ) to measure CSI. I fixed both the position of AP and client and measured CSI amplitude at three different time for testing the temporal stability. I have make sure that there is no object changing when I was sending data. There is the result which have 500 samples in each condition : [image: image] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/37927874/44848484-7f3cfb00-ac89-11e8-8e08-0a660559f9be.png
It looks unreasonable. what may cause this problem? Did anyone meet this problem before?
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/xieyaxiongfly/Atheros_CSI_tool_OpenWRT_src/issues/18, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AF-RQ1L-Rb3gfnYCxY3udkLaI-Y3-zk0ks5uV8yIgaJpZM4WTSon .
joegusj
hanstseng123
bigtreeyanger
chili6f
yujianyuanhaha
I use TP-LINK wdr4300 as AP and client which are equipped 3 antennas(although they can only use 2 antennas ) to measure CSI. I fixed both the position of AP and client and measured CSI amplitude at three different time for testing the temporal stability. I have make sure that there is no object changing when I was sending data. There is the result which have 500 samples in each condition :
It looks unreasonable. what may cause this problem? Did anyone meet this problem before?