Open takesukeDS opened 8 months ago
Thank you for your great work. The issue is described bellow.
The number of upper cloth images in your DressCode dataset is 15360.
(base) root@d2c7e4a7755e:/app/gp-vton/data/DressCode_512# ls upper/image | wc -l 15360
The sum of numbers of upper cloth images included in train_pairs_1008.txt and test_pairs_paired_1008.txt is not the same.
(base) root@d2c7e4a7755e:/app/gp-vton/data/DressCode_512# grep upper test_pairs_paired_1008.txt | wc -l 1673 (base) root@d2c7e4a7755e:/app/gp-vton/data/DressCode_512# grep upper train_pairs_1008.txt | wc -l 12505
Additionally, I believe the number of predefined test paires for unpaired setting is 1800, however you seem to use only 1559.
(base) root@d2c7e4a7755e:/app/gp-vton/data/DressCode_512# grep upper test_pairs_unpaired_1008.txt | wc -l 1559
This should affected reported scores such as FID and LPIPS. Is there any valid reason you reduced the widely used dataset? Also the same issue for your vitonhd dataset.
Best regards
Thank you for your great work. The issue is described bellow.
The number of upper cloth images in your DressCode dataset is 15360.
The sum of numbers of upper cloth images included in train_pairs_1008.txt and test_pairs_paired_1008.txt is not the same.
Additionally, I believe the number of predefined test paires for unpaired setting is 1800, however you seem to use only 1559.
This should affected reported scores such as FID and LPIPS. Is there any valid reason you reduced the widely used dataset? Also the same issue for your vitonhd dataset.
Best regards