The stacking order should be changed to match that of Routemap. In Routemap, if you write e.g. dSTRq!~lACC\CONTfq, lACC will appear over both other icons. This is because the lowest object in an “overlay stack” (in this case dSTRq, CONTfq) is layered below any objects to the left which are stacked higher (in this case lACC). This is done by only adding position: absolute for objects which are not the lowest.
For all objects which are not the lowest, the current behaviour is already correct. However, in rdt-editor, CONTfq (in the example) is placed over lACC, when it should be below.
The stacking order should be changed to match that of Routemap. In Routemap, if you write e.g.
dSTRq!~lACC\CONTfq
,lACC
will appear over both other icons. This is because the lowest object in an “overlay stack” (in this casedSTRq
,CONTfq
) is layered below any objects to the left which are stacked higher (in this caselACC
). This is done by only addingposition: absolute
for objects which are not the lowest.For all objects which are not the lowest, the current behaviour is already correct. However, in rdt-editor,
CONTfq
(in the example) is placed overlACC
, when it should be below.