I would like to use lpcnet's pitch detector and I am wondering whether I should go with lpcnet_compute_single_frame_features (that processes a single 10ms frame) or lpcnet_compute_features (that processes 4 10 ms frames at once).
From what I understood from the lpcnet codec paper, a Viterbi search is performed over 40ms packets to get a consistent pitch path. I suppose that this is implemented in lpcnet_compute_features. But concerning lpcnet_compute_single_frame_features, it seems like the pitch is computed differently since the whole 40ms "superframe" is not available.
Could you tell me if the Viterbi search is somehow also implemented in lpcnet_compute_single_frame_features ?
Or if the two functions work differently, how do they differ ?
Hello,
I would like to use lpcnet's pitch detector and I am wondering whether I should go with
lpcnet_compute_single_frame_features(that processes a single 10ms frame) orlpcnet_compute_features(that processes 4 10 ms frames at once).From what I understood from the lpcnet codec paper, a Viterbi search is performed over 40ms packets to get a consistent pitch path. I suppose that this is implemented in
lpcnet_compute_features. But concerninglpcnet_compute_single_frame_features, it seems like the pitch is computed differently since the whole 40ms "superframe" is not available.Could you tell me if the Viterbi search is somehow also implemented in
lpcnet_compute_single_frame_features? Or if the two functions work differently, how do they differ ?Thank you