Open xianyongqin opened 4 years ago
Hi @xianyongqin, I also have worse evaluation by using their evaluation code from pix3d. For Lamp, the paper has 0.124 but mine is 0.297. Did you figure out why this happen? Thanks a lot!
referencing to issue #73. For CD discrepancies, several things might be helpful for tracing the issue:
Thanks for releasing the amazing codes. Is it possible to release the evaluation codes that reproduce the Chamfer distance (GenRe, 0.106) reported in Table 1 of the GenRe paper? I followed the setting described in the paper but got a much worse Chamfer distance (GenRe, 0.30) with the released pre-trained model.