Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
Original comment by peter.de...@gmail.com
on 9 Jun 2011 at 3:08
Some of the entries in the Biodiversity Collections Index are self-standing
instututions, and it would seem appropriate to use the biocol.org lsid for
those for which this is the case. The important guidance is probably that if
the herbarium has an assigned acronym, then that acronym must go in the
collection code, beyond that, the biocol.org lsid should go in the
collectionID, and the biocol.org lsid could also go in the institutionID.
That's my take at least.
Original comment by mole@morris.net
on 9 Jun 2011 at 5:26
Original comment by peter.de...@gmail.com
on 13 Jun 2011 at 8:10
I think a suitable registry for institutions could be the GBRDS, e.g.
http://gbrds.gbif.org/browse/agent?uuid=ff7bd5db-b724-4932-b496-10ea298851f9.
One could provide "ff7bd5db-b724-4932-b496-10ea298851f9" in institutionID,
although it would probably be more helpful to provide the full link:
http://gbrds.gbif.org/browse/agent?uuid=ff7bd5db-b724-4932-b496-10ea298851f9
(see also issue 28 for resolvable vs non-resolvable).
I've updated http://code.google.com/p/applecore/wiki/CodesAndNumbers, but I'd
like your input on this.
Original comment by peter.de...@gmail.com
on 12 Nov 2011 at 8:12
Original comment by peter.de...@gmail.com
on 12 Nov 2011 at 8:18
After closing issue 28, the question is now: Are these good guidelines for
institutionCode + institutionID:
http://code.google.com/p/applecore/wiki/CodesAndNumbers#Institution_name
To recap, for institutionID, I suggest the non-resolved UUID provided by GBIF's
GBRDS, e.g. "ff7bd5db-b724-4932-b496-10ea298851f9" You can actually Google that
UUID and find information. There is no resolver service for these UUIDs, but
you can find more info at
http://gbrds.gbif.org/browse/agent?uuid=ff7bd5db-b724-4932-b496-10ea298851f9
Original comment by peter.de...@gmail.com
on 21 Nov 2011 at 2:49
GBDRS suffers from the same issue as BCI guids, many of these are not
identifiers for the relevant institution, but rather identifiers for
collections, data providers, and sub-institutions. For example, the relevant
institution for both the Museum of Comparative Zoology and the Harvard
University Herbaria is Harvard University, but neither BCI nor GBIF's GBDRS
provides a GUID for this insitution, and using any of the GUIDs they do provide
is likely to be missleading. Likewise consider PH, the institution for which
is now Drexel University. I suspect that in a very large fraction of cases for
herbaria, the GUID provided by either BCI or GBIF will be the appropriate GUID
for the CollectionID, but not for the InstitutionID.
Original comment by mole@morris.net
on 21 Nov 2011 at 3:24
InstitutionID needs to be explained.
Original comment by mole@morris.net
on 21 Nov 2011 at 3:29
Right, we have the same problem for our collections. The institution is
"Université de Montréal", but I've registered my dataset with GBIF under the
"Université de Montréal Biodiversity Centre", because I feel more comfortable
being the contact person for that sub-institution as apposed to the whole
university.
But, this doesn't stop us from advising to use GBRDS as a provider for an
institutionID, collectionID or datasetID, as long as it matches the unit
provided in institutionCode, collectionCode or datasetCode respectively. I
think that's the one thing we can suggest: if you have an GUID somewhere, that
matches the unit described, then by all means, provide it.
Do you agree?
Original comment by peter.de...@gmail.com
on 21 Nov 2011 at 3:37
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
peter.de...@gmail.com
on 9 Jun 2011 at 3:02