We are running MSISensor version 0.60 for some clinical trials using whole exome sequencing (WES) data.
We are using deduplicated BAM files as input. All other parameters set to default.
We noticed that we had significant differences in coverage between tumor-normal (higher coverage in tumor) reads thus, we turned on the normalization parameter.
After normalization, we noticed that the MSI Percent scores were magnitudes higher compared to the non-normalized version across all samples.
Is there an explanation for this? Is MSISensor 0.60 weighting rather than normalizing. We were not expecting the scores to have this drastic increase.
Thank you very much for all your help and developing MSISensor. Appreciate it!
Hi,
We are running MSISensor version 0.60 for some clinical trials using whole exome sequencing (WES) data.
We are using deduplicated BAM files as input. All other parameters set to default.
We noticed that we had significant differences in coverage between tumor-normal (higher coverage in tumor) reads thus, we turned on the normalization parameter.
After normalization, we noticed that the MSI Percent scores were magnitudes higher compared to the non-normalized version across all samples.
Is there an explanation for this? Is MSISensor 0.60 weighting rather than normalizing. We were not expecting the scores to have this drastic increase.
Thank you very much for all your help and developing MSISensor. Appreciate it!
Thanks, Fayaz.