I'm not sure if this is a bug that I'm experiencing, or just a new feature that might be nice to have, but I found that my git diff-type statements work ok for my Git-XL-enabled repo, but not interactive patch-staging using git add -p. (See example below.)
Is it possible to add support for staging specific lines of changed VBA code, based on the diff's generated by Git-XL? (e.g. in my example case, I might've wanted to commit the bottom two UDFs separately from the top Sub; would it be possible to implement something like this?)
Perhaps this is outside the scope of what Git-XL is trying to provide, or isn't really even possible. But I figured, couldn't hurt to ask...
I'm not sure if this is a bug that I'm experiencing, or just a new feature that might be nice to have, but I found that my
git diff-type statements work ok for my Git-XL-enabled repo, but not interactive patch-staging usinggit add -p. (See example below.)Is it possible to add support for staging specific lines of changed VBA code, based on the diff's generated by Git-XL? (e.g. in my example case, I might've wanted to commit the bottom two UDFs separately from the top Sub; would it be possible to implement something like this?)
Perhaps this is outside the scope of what Git-XL is trying to provide, or isn't really even possible. But I figured, couldn't hurt to ask...