xmidt-org / svalinn

The shield to protect our users from incoming events. Part of codex.
Apache License 2.0
1 stars 7 forks source link

Bump github.com/xmidt-org/wrp-go/v3 from 3.1.3 to 3.1.4 #167

Closed dependabot[bot] closed 2 years ago

dependabot[bot] commented 2 years ago

Bumps github.com/xmidt-org/wrp-go/v3 from 3.1.3 to 3.1.4.

Release notes

Sourced from github.com/xmidt-org/wrp-go/v3's releases.

v3.1.4 2022-08-24

  • Add simple message types WRP validators #85
  • Add basic WRP spec validators #84
  • Introduce WRP Validation Framework #80
  • Fix unmarshalling error due to missig metadata fields #79
  • Deprecated the concrete message structs, e.g. SimpleEvent
  • Added support for the new qos field.
  • QOS implementation #93, #81

v3.1.4-dev.1 2022-07-20

  • Add simple message types WRP validators #85
  • Add basic WRP spec validators #84
  • Introduce WRP Validation Framework #80
  • Fix unmarshalling error due to missig metadata fields #79
  • Deprecated the concrete message structs, e.g. SimpleEvent
  • Added support for the new qos field.
  • QOS implementation #93, #81
Changelog

Sourced from github.com/xmidt-org/wrp-go/v3's changelog.

[v3.1.4]

  • Add simple message types WRP validators #85
  • Add basic WRP spec validators #84
  • Introduce WRP Validation Framework #80
  • Fix unmarshalling error due to missig metadata fields #79
  • Deprecated the concrete message structs, e.g. SimpleEvent
  • Added support for the new qos field.
  • QOS implementation #93, #81
Commits
  • ae83785 Merge pull request #100 from xmidt-org/denopink/release/v3.1.4
  • bbfcd15 Update CHANGELOG.md
  • feb49d8 Update README.md
  • 8299e4d Merge pull request #99 from xmidt-org/fix-formatting
  • 86278b2 Fix the code formatting issues.
  • ab0be60 Add auto-approval workflow.
  • 00b14ff Migrate to use dependabot for dependency updates.
  • 840f989 Adding issue updating for the team project board.
  • 456907d Merge pull request #94 from xmidt-org/v3.1.4-dev.1
  • 798a6ee dev release
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view


Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging - `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed - `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
codecov[bot] commented 2 years ago

Codecov Report

Merging #167 (eca05ce) into main (65e1e9b) will not change coverage. The diff coverage is n/a.

:exclamation: Current head eca05ce differs from pull request most recent head 3373a86. Consider uploading reports for the commit 3373a86 to get more accurate results

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #167   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   51.14%   51.14%           
=======================================
  Files           8        8           
  Lines         567      567           
=======================================
  Hits          290      290           
  Misses        269      269           
  Partials        8        8           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 51.14% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

sonarcloud[bot] commented 2 years ago

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information