Closed xoolive closed 5 months ago
ICAO docs only say for example for Malta
About Malta: that's exactly 4d2000
to 4d23ff
, but they obviously went over their limit already. I am wondering whether there has been an update in those documents that we are not aware of.
Addresses are allocated (to my knowledge) in Annex 10 Volume III. From ICAO page [1], the last Amendment of volume 3 is from 2021...
Are the examples above correct ones, or errors?
For 9H-VVI you can see it is in the list of the registered aircraft in Malta [2]...unfortunately they do not provide ICAO 24-bit addresses. It is also possible that they are using a temporary address...this can be done for one year and eventually renewable... Is this the only instance of a Maltese address beyond the allocated block?
For the others it is all reverse engineering, I guess.
[2] https://www.transport.gov.mt/aviation/aircraft-flight-standards/registration-of-aircraft-2663
No I see many aircraft beyond the upper limit, with tail numbers associated to Malta. I wonder how much reverse engineering is really necessary here... :sob:
Others are using the default ranges https://github.com/Mictronics/readsb-protobuf/blob/dev/webapp/src/script/readsb/backend/flags.ts
Well similar to my file here...
Reading ICAO meeting resolutions it looks like States do not fully comply with correct allocation of the blocks...
Some counterintuitive examples to investigate:
4d24ca
/9H-VVI
(among many others): registered in Malta, out of the Malta range (4d2000
to4d23ff
).Does the range need to be edited?
c95000
/4W-AAL
: registered in Timor-Leste, undocumented range (Vanuatu stops atc903ff
) Does Timor-Leste have a range?T2-
are assigned to Tuvalu, no range in thepatterns.json
file. I have two occurrencesT2-6965
(7d007c
) andT2-6322
(7cd518
), in the Australia range (7c0000
to7fffff
), mostly visible in Australia. What to think?@espinielli any hint?