Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Vincenzo,
Apologies, you are right... I see a hardcoded 50.000 value, and for some reason
I did not implement the same mechanism as against ordinary noderefs. (Fetch say
50.000, then the next 50.000, until done) This mechanism is the reason why it
is ordered by 'latest'. I gues I have to revisit this implementation... This
will be there in the next version. I hope you can stretch it until then...
You can edit the filter any way you like. I just provided a basic
implementation of a filter. Feel free to create many more... (And exclude the
one provided :-) )
(You wanna create an unmonitored backdoor?)
Original comment by tjarda.p...@incentro.com
on 28 Feb 2014 at 9:01
Hi Tjarda,
Thanks for your answer,
Just for information I've add an audit filter that permit to avoid the
audit at least for admin user:
audit.filter.alfresco-api.post.AuthenticationService.default.enabled=true
audit.filter.alfresco-api.post.default.enabled=true
audit.filter.alfresco-api.post.AuthenticationService.authenticate.default.enable
d=true
audit.filter.alfresco-api.post.AuthenticationService.authenticate.args.enabled=t
rue
audit.filter.alfresco-api.post.AuthenticationService.authenticate.args.userName=
~System;~null;~admin;.*
This could be useful to add in your module (alfresco-global.properties)
A good feature that could be added is the compatibility with other DB as
well as PostgreSQL and Oracle
(You wanna create an unmonitored backdoor?) Sure, I can try to help you to add
some functionality in your package.
Best Regards
Vincenzo
Original comment by vincenzo...@gmail.com
on 28 Feb 2014 at 3:51
Got my main issue in reporting fixed, this one is next...
Tjarda
Original comment by tjarda.p...@incentro.com
on 3 Mar 2014 at 11:46
And the bad news is that due to the nature of the callback mechanism by
Alfresco I cannot determine how big my resultset is. In other words, it is hard
to determine when (or how often) to repeat the query to get all results...
I think this is a problem only in the initial loading of the reporting database
though.... I updated the value of 50.000 into Integer.MAX_VALUE and I am going
to sleep over it...
Suggestions are welcome...
Original comment by tjarda.p...@incentro.com
on 4 Mar 2014 at 10:21
Original comment by tjarda.p...@incentro.com
on 4 Mar 2014 at 10:22
Option as discussed in #4 is implemented in the next release. Hereby I will
close the issue....
Original comment by tjarda.p...@incentro.com
on 6 Apr 2014 at 8:56
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
vincenzo...@gmail.com
on 24 Feb 2014 at 2:34