search

xorpaul / g10k

my r10k fork in Go
Apache License 2.0
127 stars 51 forks source link

Please update documentation about different behavior between r10k and g10k #78

Closed riton closed 7 years ago

riton commented 7 years ago

First of all, thanks ! I was planning to implement something like r10k in GoLang and then I found your project. Big kudos to you !

Then I've tried to use g10k on the Puppetfile we're using and I hit bug #2 . I had to dig into the code to really understand why it was mis-interpreting (differently as r10k) our git based modules as forge modules. And then I found the bug.

Can you please update the documentation and mention that this behavior is different than r10k one ? This could save next person some time :-)

Note : maybe that #2 can be closed if you do not plan to support it at all ?

Thanks !

blackknight36 commented 7 years ago

I second this. g10k claims to be a drop-in replacement for r10k but in truth it requires changes to your puppetfile to work properly.

xorpaul commented 7 years ago

Removed any mention of drop-in replacement from readme