Open xot opened 9 years ago
I don't have any problem with that, but wonder then what the alternative structure would look like - if we do not have the current suggestion
* Prerequisites
* Engineering Lifecycle
* Hardware
* Software
* Webapps and services
* Mobile Apps
* Desktop software
* Components and libraries
* Operating systems
* Network infrastructure services
* Data stores
* Analytics & BigData
* Resources
Would something like this be better (not neccessarily these topics, but this approach)
If so, does this do enough to get the big picture across - the PbD applies throughout the lifecycle - or do we also the need to specifically address the legal, process and organisational aspects or crossover in the engineering lifecycle
Currently the document is structured in terms of application areas.
The core contributions to the cookbook should, in my mind, be descriptions of generic, privacy friendly, solutions to a recurring problem. Some call them privacy design patterns. Some of these problems (and patterns) occur in one application area; others may surface in many. Question is then where to put them in the current structure.