Closed chiahaoliu closed 5 years ago
@xpdAcq/bls Thoughts?
I'm not sure what the purpose of this is. Aren't we able to do this at the ipython level?
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019, 3:09 PM Christopher J. Wright < notifications@github.com wrote:
@xpdAcq/bls https://github.com/orgs/xpdAcq/teams/bls Thoughts?
— You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/xpdAcq/mission-control/issues/153#issuecomment-455314590, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMQJYYlP6CkdXhVzADUS7Z3VEHRkF-ABks5vENhdgaJpZM4YMCfn .
Yes. we are able to do it at ipython level easily. The hope of this discussion is to come up with persistent names (approved by beamline) that will live in the start-up sequence.
I think we can close this, right @DanOlds?
Super close!
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019, 10:31 AM Christopher J. Wright < notifications@github.com wrote:
I think we can close this, right @DanOlds https://github.com/DanOlds?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/xpdAcq/mission-control/issues/153#issuecomment-460681620, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMQJYR9YM_jLErillJke7N00u83cV37zks5vKaPYgaJpZM4YMCfn .
We might need more verbose names for the detector objects, since now both far and near detector are connected simultaneously. User could trigger the one that's not in the beam easily when they are coding their own plan...
attn: @sghose @dooryhee
Expected Behavior
Simple alias will be helpful, like
Current Behavior
User can trigger
pe1c
when far detector is in the beamPossible solution
Assign alias (approved by the beamline staff) during startup?