xproc / 3.0-specification

A community-driven effort to define an XProc 3.0 specification (formerly 1.1)
http://spec.xproc.org/
33 stars 10 forks source link

Attempt to clarify p:import-functions #1111

Closed ndw closed 2 months ago

ndw commented 2 months ago

Fix #1110

ndw commented 2 months ago

Yes. I think you're absolutely right. I did note in the issue that I wasn't sure what the right answer was. Thanks for telling me :-)

xml-project commented 2 months ago

@ndw

I did note in the issue that I wasn't sure what the right answer was.

Sorry, I missed that question.