search

xproc / 3.0-steps

Repository for change requests to the standard step library and for official extension steps
10 stars 7 forks source link

proposal for p:run, #331 #394

Closed gimsieke closed 4 years ago

gimsieke commented 4 years ago

@ndw I referenced <e:rng-pattern name="Run"/> in specification.xml. The pattern probably needs to be defined by that name in core30.rnc in the grammar repo. Maybe you can change that after you merged https://github.com/xproc/3.0-grammar/pull/17

gimsieke commented 4 years ago

@ndw ../../../build/examples/run.txt has not been created. I was naïvely hoping that it would automatically be generated if I added step-run/src/main/examples/run.xml

gimsieke commented 4 years ago

@ndw I commented out <e:rng-pattern name="Run"/> for the time being and I included the example as escaped XML instead of XInclude, but the Travis build still fails:

> Task :step-run:rng FAILED
/home/travis/build/[secure]/step-run/build/steps.rnc:7:1: error: syntax error

The RNC of the run step should be in the 3.0-grammar repo that hasn’t changed because PR https://github.com/xproc/3.0-grammar/pull/17 hasn’t been merged.

I tried to enable at least some build so that one can look at the HTML rendering but I give up now.

ndw commented 4 years ago

If you rebase this off the latest master, I believe it will build. Sorry about the delay.