I think there is an inconsistency between the reported results in p:directory-list and p:file-info when it comes to additional attributes (like executable). In p:directory-list it says:
As a consequence, implementers can choose whatever they want. But in p:file-info it says:
Additional implementation-defined attributes may be present, but they must be in a namespace.
My intuition would be to expect, that the step results for a file/folder should be the same for a given file. Additional attribute should be either in namespace or not. I have a slight preference for making them namespaced in both steps.
I think there is an inconsistency between the reported results in
p:directory-list
andp:file-info
when it comes to additional attributes (likeexecutable
). Inp:directory-list
it says:As a consequence, implementers can choose whatever they want. But in
p:file-info
it says:My intuition would be to expect, that the step results for a file/folder should be the same for a given file. Additional attribute should be either in namespace or not. I have a slight preference for making them namespaced in both steps.