Closed xml-project closed 2 years ago
What grammar, where? It looks correct in the spec and in the spec's steps.xpl
In theory, the grammar is built from the step declarations in the spec, so they shouldn't get out-of-sync. "Shouldn't."
In my local repo "3.0-grammar" steps/step-os/steps.rng Sorry: Its already fixed in the repo. Working with an old local copy.
The specs says the option is called "error-content-type" but the grammar says it is named "errors-content-type". I would fix it, if I would know how.