Closed ndw closed 2 months ago
It's an annoying "security feature" of the PR builds that stylesheet changes aren't reflected in them. See this copy to preview the style changes.
I've added the implementation defined/dependent features to the summary and done a better brute-force job of linking from the names of ports and options to their descriptions.
I was tinkering with a step last night and got a bee in my bonnet about the style of the step summaries. My first thought was that adding some syntax highlighting would improve things. And I guess maybe it did.
Then this morning, I got distracted by the idea that maybe the whole thing could be improved and made more readable.
So here it is. It's certainly different and...I think...it's an improvement.
One observation: the links from the names of ports and options in the summary to their descriptions only work if the descriptions are formatted as a variable list. The fact that we haven't done that in a lot of places is interesting.
This relates to @xatapult 's thoughts about refactoring the spec entirely in some future version. But in this case there's no change in the spec, just a change in the presentation.